Developing a Novel Approach for Evaluation Performance of the Engineering Departments Managers Using 360° Technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23918/eajse.v2i2p56Keywords:
Performance of Individuals, 360 Techniques,, Residential Complexes ProjectsAbstract
This paper deals with creating evaluation criteria for the planning, design, execution managers in Housing Directorate, which is very important for the service quality in work. Results of the study proved the possibility of the use of 360° technique in evaluating the performance of managers in the Housing Directorate, which means the possibility of circulation in the construction sector. Moreover, the study showed in general of gaps between self-evaluation and individual evaluation process, which indicates the need for an organizational culture that encourages objectivity in passing judgments and accepts the views of others. The existence of negative gaps in responses between the parties of the evaluation process appears the manager’s overstatement in the existence of the evaluation criteria in them. Therefore, the final degree of evaluation was (4.28) v. Good for planning manager, (4.56) excellent for design manager and (3.84) v. Good for execution manager.
References
Basu, T. (2015). Integrating 360-degree feedback in to performance appraisal tool and development
process. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 17(1), 50-61.
Çınar, F., & Vardarlıer, P. (2014). Establishment of individual performance evaluation system in a
health business and a pilot practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 384-
393.
D. McCarthy, D. (2012). The Great Leadership Development and Succession Planning Kit. Cork:
1
st Ed. Enabled, Book Baby, 2012.
Espinilla, M., de Andrés, R., Martínez, F. J., & Martínez, L. (2013). A 360-degree performance
appraisal model dealing with heterogeneous information and dependent criteria.
Information Sciences, 222, 459-471.
Kaur, S. (2013). 360 Degrees performance appraisal-benefits and shortcoming. International
Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology, 2(6), 83-88.
Performance Management, “The 360 Degree Feedback. Advantages, Disadvantages & Design”,
Human Resource in a Nutshell, 26th October 2011.
Rani L., Kumar N., & Sushil K. (2014). Performance appraisals research: A study of performance
appraisals practices in private banks. Journal of Research in Commerce & Management,
3(1), 108-113.
Rasheed S., Dahsh E., & Radhi J. (2011). Evaluating the performance of heads of scientific
departments using the entrance feeding reverse 360 degrees. Periodical of Management
and Economics - University of Qadisiya, 10-21.
Tarus B. (2014). Effectiveness of the 360-degrees appraisal tool in human resource practice in
Kenya. Journal of Marketing and Business Management, 3(1) 10-21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Eurasian J. Sci. Eng is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY-4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
