Geophysical Study of the Soil Surrounding Designed Submerged Concrete Tank Using Seismic Refraction Technique
Keywords:
Seismic Refraction, P-Wave Velocity, Soil Layers, Weak ZonesAbstract
A shallow geophysical investigation using seismic refraction technique was conducted to specify soil layers quality surrounded a designed water storage tank as well as to detect whether any subsurface structural features like (weak zones, cavities or faults) present or not, if it is present, it will create a risk after constructing the project. For this purpose four profiles were conducted around the tank using seismic refraction technique. Interpretation results indicate the presence of three layers. The top soil layer has a velocity ranges between (200 to 665 m/sec), it refers to unconsolidated weathered layer submerged by a drift sediments along profiles No.(1) and (2), and the second layer with the velocity ranges between (800 to 1550 m/sec), which indicates of moderately cohesive soil layer. However, the third layer with the velocity ranges between (2930 to 4425 m/sec), which reveals to the highly compacted soil layer, these ranges of velocity will reflect increasing of density as well as strength of the soil layers with increasing depths. The depth section under profile No.(1) from the first to the second layer from geophones No.(6) to (18) as well as for profile No.(2) from geophones No.(8) to (12) are revealed by the presence of the weak zone results from the submerged drift sediments including fissures and fractures. Processing of the weak zone can be done by removing of the first layer then constructing by a thick concrete foundation on the second layer as well as the supported concrete wall is necessary to avoid future risk, which may result from hydrostatic pressure on the tank.
References
ABEM. (1983). ABEM TERRALOC Mk-II Seismic System, Issued by Atlas Copco ABEM AB,
Box 20086, S-16120 Bromma, Sweden.
Alhassan D.U., Ugbor D.O., Ejepu, S.J., Mufutau, O.J & Mohammed, A. (2015). Seismic
Refraction Survey for Groundwater Potentials of Northern Paiko Area. Niger State, Nigeria.
IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics, 3(2), 41-48.
Alkhafaji, A. J. (2004). The use of seismic methods for investigation weak zones and geotechnical
evaluation of Al-Hussain pure water site Kerbala, Dept. of the Earth Science, Collage of
Science, Baghdad University, M. Sc thesis.
AlSinawi. (1981). Introduction to applied geophysics. University of Baghdad Press, First edition.
Anomohanran, O. (2013). Seismic refraction method: A technique for determining the thickness of
stratified substratum. American. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10 (8). doi:10.3844/ajassp,
857.862.
Arild P. (1996). Application of seismic refraction survey in assessment of jointing, Conference on
Recent Advances in Tunneling Technology, New Delhi.
Griffiths D. H. & King R. F. (1981). Applied geophysics for geologists and Engineers. Oxford:
Pergamon Press.
Hagedoorn, J.G. (1959). The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction section sections:
Geophysical Prospecting, 2, 85-127.
Khan M. A. (2013). Engineering Geophysical Study of Unconsolidated Top Soil Using Shallow
Seismic Refraction and Electrical Resistivity Techniques. Journal of Environment and Earth
Science, 3(8).
Overmeeren, V. R. A. (2001). Hagedoorn‟s plus-minus method: the beauty of simplicity:
Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 687-696.
Surfer-8. (2002). Surfer mapping system, Golden software Inc., 14 th street, Golden Colorado.
Telford W., Geldert L., & Sheriff R. (1990). Applied geophysics. Boston, MA, 2nd Edition,
Cambridge university press,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Eurasian J. Sci. Eng is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY-4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/