Investigating The Effect of Trinia and Zirconia Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture On Stress Distribution in Peripheral Bone: A Three Dimensional Finite Element Modeling

Authors: Nabeel Seryoka Martani1 & Berivan Nawzad Hadi2
1Department of Prosthodontic, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
2Department of Prosthodontic, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq

Abstract: Stress transformation from fixed partial denture to dental implant and distribution to surrounding bones is an essential factor in long term survival rate of prosthesis. The main objective of this study was to analyze the effect of a newly developed material (Trinia) and the conventional Zirconia implant-supported fixed partial dentures on stress transformation and distribution in the surrounding bone of dental implants. For this purpose, 3D finite element models of implant supported fixed bridge with surrounding bone were developed and simulated for both Trinia and Zirconia materials subjected to static loading. The results showed that the occlusal load transformed through Trinia and distributed to supporting bone was greater in premolar and molar regions compared to zirconia. This study demonstrates that using different material for fabrication of implant supported bridges directly affects the stress distribution in the peripheral bone which can enhance the knowledge in clinics to improve longevity of prosthesis.

Keywords: Dental Biomechanics, Zirconia, Trinia, Implant Length, Finite Element Modeling

Download the PDF Document

Doi: 10.23918/eajse.v9i1p252

Published: January 24, 2023

References

Ahmad I (1998). Yttrium-partially stabilized zirconium dioxide posts: an approach to restoring coronally compromised nonvital teeth. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 18.

Anitua E, Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra N, Morales Martín I & Saracho Rotaeche L (2021a). Influence of Dental Implant Diameter and Bone Quality on the Biomechanics of Single-Crown Restoration. A Finite Element Analysis. Dentistry Journal, 9, 103.

Anitua E, Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra N, Morales Martín I & Saracho Rotaeche LJDJ (2021b). Influence of Dental Implant Diameter and Bone Quality on the Biomechanics of Single-Crown Restoration. A Finite Element Analysis, 9, 103.

Anusavice KJ, Shen C & Rawls HR (2012). Phillips’ science of dental materials, Elsevier Health Sciences.

Bahat O (2000). Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 15.

Benetti P, Kelly JR & Della Bona A (2013). Analysis of thermal distributions in veneered zirconia and metal restorations during firing. Dental Materials, 29, 1166-1172.

Buser D, Weber HP, Brägger U & Balsiger C (1994). Tissue integration of one-stage implants: three-year results of a prospective longitudinal study with hollow cylinder and hollow screw implants. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 25, 679-679.

El Moheb M, Cherine F, Sghaireen M, Pati SR, Alam MK & Elie A (2019). Basal Implant: An Overview. International Medical Journal, 26.

Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U & Thomsen P (1998). Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. European journal of oral sciences, 106, 527-551.

Gao J, Xu W & Ding Z (2006). 3D finite element mesh generation of complicated tooth model based on CT slices. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 82, 97-105.

Gehrke SA, Frugis VL, Shibli JA, Fernandez MPR, de Val JEMS, Girardo JLC et al (2016). Influence of implant design (cylindrical and conical) in the load transfer surrounding long (13mm) and short (7mm) length implants: a photoelastic analysis. The open dentistry journal, 10, 522.

Jiang X, Yao Y, Tang W, Han D, Zhang L, Zhao K et al (2020). Design of dental implants at materials level: An overview. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 108, 1634-1661.

Kelly JR & Benetti P (2011). Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Australian dental journal, 56, 84-96.

Kitamura, E., Stegaroiu, R., Nomura, S., and Miyakawa, O. (2004). Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis’, Clin Oral Implants Res, 15(4), 401-412

Lekholm U (1985). Patient selection and preparation. Tissue-integrated prosthesis: osseointegration in clinical dentistry, 199-209.

Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H & Iizuka T (2005). Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery—clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone, 37, 776-780.

Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler‐Moncler S, Bernard JP & Samson J (2004). Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability: A resonance‐frequency analysis study with delayed and immediately loaded ITI SLA implants. Clinical oral implants research, 15, 520-528.

Piconi C & Maccauro G (1999). Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials; 20, 1-25.

Prados-Privado M, Bea JA, Rojo R, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL & Prados-Frutos JC (2017). A new model to study fatigue in dental implants based on probabilistic finite elements and cumulative damage model. Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2017.

Prados-Privado M, Gehrke SA, Rojo R & Carlos Prados-Frutos J (2018). Probability of Failure of Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants with Different Bone Levels: A Mechanical Test and Probabilistic Fatigue. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 33.

Saxena A & Chandak M (2016). Finite Element Analysis (FEA) as a Decisive Tool for Study of Force Distribution in Dentistry. Sch J Dent Sci.

Schwiedrzik JJ, Wolfram U & Zysset PK (2013). A generalized anisotropic quadric yield criterion and its application to bone tissue at multiple length scales. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 12, 1155-1168.

Sennerby L, Thomsen P & Ericson LE (1992). A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 7.

Spiekermann H, Jansen VK & Richter E-J (1995). A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 10.

Tarnow DP, Emtiaz S & Classi A (1997). Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1-to 5-year data. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 12.

Trisi P & Rao W (1999). Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clinical oral implants research, 10, 1-7.

Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, Van der Perre G, De Coomans M, Lieven S et al (1998). The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clinical oral implants research, 9, 407-418.

Van Staden R, Guan H & Loo Y-C (2006). Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 9, 257-270.

Viceconti M, Zannoni C, Testi D, Petrone M, Perticoni S, Quadrani P et al (2007). The multimod application framework: a rapid application development tool for computer aided medicine. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 85, 138-151.

Wahengbam P, Fatima D, Sehrawat M, Budhiraja D & Ravi N (2021). A review on loading protocols in implants. IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 7, 37-40.