@article{jamil,omarsabahmohammedandmajeed,bahozhimdad2023,
author = {Jamil, Omar Sabah Mohammed and Majeed, Bahoz Himdad},
title = {Comparison Of Fracture Torque And Level Of Fracture Of Two Orthodontic Mini-Screw ( AN IN VITRO STUDY)},
journal = {Eurasian J. Sci. Eng},
volume = {9},
number = {2},
pages = {241-251},
year = {2023}
}
Copy
Statistics
Article Views: 328
PDF Downloads: 89
Comparison Of Fracture Torque And Level Of Fracture Of Two Orthodontic Mini-Screw ( AN IN VITRO STUDY)
Omar Sabah Mohammed Jamil ¹* and Bahoz Himdad Majeed ²
Affiliation¹ Orthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq
² Orthodontics Department , Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Kitab University, Kirkuk, Iraq
* Correspodning Author
ORCID :
Omar Sabah: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-1460, Bahoz Himdad: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1631-9227
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.23918/eajse.v9i2p19
Article History
|
Received: 2023-05-04 |
Revised: 2023-06-18 |
Accepted: 2023-06-23 |
Certain malocclusions may benefit from the use of mini-screw anchoring control during orthodontic treatment. In contrast, the failure of little screws will have a substantial influence on treatment efficiency and effectiveness. Twenty orthodontic mini-implants of (Tomas. Dentaurm. Germany; GNI, Korean) were inspected in an in-vitro study. A digital torque gauge was positioned perpendicular to the bone surface and placed into the 10 mm thick bovine femoral cortical bone in the same manner as mini-implants. The insertion done through the hand driver simulations of insertion intraorally. The Tomas offered a high fracture torque value compared with GNI. GNI gave a high percentage of fracture at an apical level while Tomas gave at the middle of it.
Mini Screws; Anchorage; GNI Mini Screws; Tomas Mini Screws
[1] Nanda R, Uribe FA, Yadav S. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences. 2019.
Google Scholar
[2] Umalkar SS, Jadhav VV, Paul P, Reche A, Jadhav Sr VV. Modern Anchorage Systems in Orthodontics. Cureus. 2022; 14(11). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31476
Google Scholar
[3] Mizrahi E, Mizrahi B. Mini-screw implants (temporary anchorage devices): orthodontic and pre-prosthetic applications. Journal of Orthodontics. 2007; 34(2): 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225021987
Google Scholar
[4] Cope JB, editor Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a paradigm shift. Seminars in orthodontics. 2005; Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2004.11.002
Google Scholar
[5] Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2016; 149(3): 308-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.020
Google Scholar
[6] O'Brien K. Lets talk about micro-osteoperforation…. Trials. 2017.
[7] Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, Kim C, Olson J, Javadi S, et al. Ability of mini-implant–facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2016; 150(6): 958-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.030
Google Scholar
[8] Nimeri G, Kau CH, Abou-Kheir NS, Corona R. Acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment-a frontier in orthodontics. Progress in orthodontics. 2013; 14(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-42
Google Scholar
[9] Wilmes B, Rademacher C, Olthoff G, Drescher D. Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implantsEinfluss der Insertionsparameter auf die Primärstabilität orthodontischer mini-Implantate. J Orofac Orthop/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2006; 67: 162-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-006-0611-z
Google Scholar
[10] Mattos CT, Ruellas ACdO, Elias CN. Is it possible to re-use mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage? Results of an in vitro study. Materials Research. 2010; 13: 521-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392010000400015
Google Scholar
[11] Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, Drescher D. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011; 33(4): 396-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq151
Google Scholar
[12] Park H-S, Jeong S-H, Kwon O-W. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2006; 130(1): 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032
Google Scholar
[13] Merk BR, Stern SH, Cordes S, Lautenschlager EP. A fatigue life analysis of small fragment screws. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2001; 15(7): 494-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200109000-00006
Google Scholar
[14] Friberg B, Sennerby L, Gröndahl K, Bergström C, Bäck T, Lekholm U. On cutting torque measurements during implant placement: a 3‐year clinical prospective study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 1999; 1(2): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00095.x
Google Scholar
[15] Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2007; 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.09.006
Google Scholar
Jamil, O. S.M., & Majeed, B. H. (2023). Comparison Of Fracture Torque And Level Of Fracture Of Two Orthodontic Mini-Screw ( AN IN VITRO STUDY). Eurasian J. Sci. Eng, 9(2),241-251.
CopyJamil, OSM, and Majeed, BH. "Comparison Of Fracture Torque And Level Of Fracture Of Two Orthodontic Mini-Screw ( AN IN VITRO STUDY)." Eurasian J. Sci. Eng, 9.2, (2023), pp.241-251.
CopyJamil, O.S.M. and Majeed, B.H., (2023) "Comparison Of Fracture Torque And Level Of Fracture Of Two Orthodontic Mini-Screw ( AN IN VITRO STUDY)", Eurasian J. Sci. Eng, 9(2), pp.241-251.
CopyJamil OSM, Majeed BH. Comparison Of Fracture Torque And Level Of Fracture Of Two Orthodontic Mini-Screw ( AN IN VITRO STUDY). Eurasian J. Sci. Eng. 2023; 9(2):241-251.
CopyUnder Development
Under Development
Under Development